Is Life too Short for Perfect Street Photography

Life's Too Short for Perfect Writing

Echuca Australia July 2009

Having heard of an interesting piece of graffiti, I went to see and photograph it. It’s a statement that reads, simply, Life’s too short for perfect writing. Seems like such a simple on the surface, but it is a deceptive idea, and one that I at least should examine carefully. First thing I would like to do, however, is change it a bit to read:

Life is too short for perfect street photography

The first thing to say is that the statement does not say that life is too short for good street photography; in my opinion there is no place for any other kind. Here good for me refers to the intention of the photographer: not all of us are gifted with a camera (though some of us can dream!). So, it is the word perfect that gives us trouble here.

Of course a thing—whether street photography or anything else—might be perfect by its nature or by the way in which it is able to express its purpose. It is the pursuit of perfection (as opposed to the pursuit of excellence: the two are not the same) that life is too short for I think.

Perfectionism is a curse! At least it has been for me. Nothing has ever been good enough; I have never been satisfied with my efforts, no matter how successful those efforts have been. Of course being cursed with perfectionism doesn’t only apply to oneself: all people and all things in one’s life are affected, and the curse rolls on and on doing its damage and preventing authenticity, full truth and life to express itself.

The other part of this statement worth looking at is Life’s too short. Life is what life is; it can be neither too short or too long;? it can only be its perfect (you see? here is a use of perfect in a natural and correct context) length. And this is precisely why it is too short for perfect street photography.

Life is for living. There is no meaning to it outside of that which we create during our time of living, and then it is only for the duration of that life (as far as we can know of course). A part of that meaning, for me as for many many other photographers, is to make photos. And it is required of us to make our photographs as good (however we define that) as we can. If our photos communicate the intended ideas in a way that our viewer can relate to, then it is perfect. There is no need to think about it anymore.

Thank you

By the way, the statement appeared at the bottom of a cafe menu scrawled onto an old iron sheeting fence behind the cafe, near the river near where we live. It, I think, refers to the untidyness of the handwriting on the sign. A sort of apology I guess. Interesting.

Photographing the Self: What's it all really about?

Pucker Up and Pose for a Self Portrait (Almere The Netherlands July 2013)

Do you take photographs? And if you do, have you asked yourself why you do? Have you thought about the motivations, the reasons, the end results you are looking for when you make a photo?  Of course as a social documentary/street photographer, it is part of the job description to be questioning my own motivations, my own purpose and intention, on an ongoing basis. But, I have been thinking lately about that oft quoted observation: “everyone’s a photographer these days”.

I’m not into the debate about who’s a photographer and who isn’t. I am simply interested in what all those people who are now “photographers” are doing, and why. 

First up, I thought I would find out how many photos are posted each day on the internet.  As of February this year (2015) 300 million per day were being put up on Facebook, and the latest news from Instagram reports that over 70 million photos and videos are uploaded every day to their site. When you think that these are only two of many social media platforms (not to mention other types of websites), it’s probably true to claim that the total number of photos being made and then posted to the internet every day is many times those figures: hundreds of millions of photos. Every day.

There is no doubt that the proliferation of mobile phones equipped with cameras accounts for many, even most, of these photos. And according to my research, it seems that most social media sites are experiencing huge growth in the number of photos posted. Many claim that this suggests photography as a pastime or hobby is growing ever more popular.

While this may be true, I think there is something else at work here. I believe that most people making photos today are not doing it as a hobby for pastime: for the majority “taking” photos serves other purposes. Of course I can’t speak for everyone who posts photos on social media, but I am convinced that the camera (or more often the smartphone) has become for many of us another tool we use to get ourselves noticed, to “be seen” as one writer has put it. For many the photograph is not a way to explore or view the world or even “as a way of seeing what the world looks like in a photograph” as the prolific street photographer Garry Winogrand once said of his own reasons for making photographs.

Just take a scroll through your Facebook feed, or have a look at Instagram. On both you will see untold numbers of images of food, people’s meals and desserts. You will see photos (and discussions too) of the latest clothes the poster has bought and countless photos of people’s possessions: cars, computers, sound systems; the list is endless. And then there is the ubiquitous “selfies”. What we used to call self portraits have now become less a way for us to explore ourselves and our place in the universe and more a way to compete, to show off, to tell the world what we’ve got, how “cool” we and our possessions and our lives are.

You can even buy “selfie sticks”, equipped with Bluetooth no less, for taking those photos of yourself with your phone. I see them more and more on the street. Once upon a time it was fairly common to ask a bystander or someone passing by to take your photo if you were alone and wanted to record what you were doing or where you were. Nowadays, even this sharing and connection is denied as we slip more and more into a kind of narcissism which is aided and abetted by our materialistic and status driven society.

Remember Narcissus? He was that guy who came across a pond in the forest. Kneeling down to take a drink, he caught sight of his face reflected in the smooth surface of the pond. He was so taken with his reflection that he fell in love with it. He talked to it, smiled at it and tried to convince it to return his love, but each time he reached out to touch that beautiful face in the water, the image dissolved into ripples which faded away. 

Eventually he realized that the face in the water was his own reflection but he was still so obsessed that he stayed by the pond until he starved to death (one version has it that Narcissus was so grief stricken at not being able to possess his new love that he stabbed himself).

I think the lesson from this sad story is plain. The infatuation with mirages or reflections of ourselves is not healthy. As was the case with Narcissus, we can become so caught up in the surface reflection that we present to the world that we are not able to go any further with an exploration of self. Maybe we don’t take it the extremes that this guy did (he had already rejected love from all who offered it) but a fixation on that surface reflection does lead to disconnection from others, a growing lack of empathy and an over-concern for surface appearances to the detriment of the real us and what is really going on in and around us.

Am I saying that all “selfies” are bad? Of course not. Am I saying you should never share with your friends what you had for breakfast, or your new outfit/car/whatever? No, I am not. What I am saying is this: sometimes, just sometimes, when you are tempted to take a photo of yourself or your breakfast, look around. Ask someone near to you would they mind taking the photo for you.

One more thing: Dump the selfie stick (literally and/or metaphorically) and turn the camera or your phone the other way and engage with the world.

Peace

Couple Lunching: Just Another Ordinary Moment?

Couple Lunching, a photo by Pauls-Pictures on Flickr.

Yes it is, isn't it? An ordinary moment I mean. Mind you, eating lunch can be serous business. At least these two are really into it in a serious way.
But, yes it is an ordinary moment. Or, as I have often said or written: a "so-called ordinary moment".
In reality it is a rather special moment. I mean by this that it is a moment that, had it not been for me passing by with my camera, would not have been noticed (by anyone at all really), would be soon forgotten (by these two as they rushed away after their clearly hurried lunch break), and would certainly have gone unrecorded.
Of course it is not simply the act of recording a moment that makes it special. But look at this photo more closely. Who are these people? What is going on? Why do they seem so serious? Are they as alienated from each other as the photo suggests? Or are they just really hungry or in a hurry? And, where are they? What are they doing there? (aside from eating that is).
Questions, questions, questions. And, to be honest, there are, nor will there ever be, any answers we will ever be able to provide for these questions.
And, that is just one of the beautiful and interesting things about this photograph (and about street and social documentary photography as a whole). We are witnesses to a mere slither of time in the lives of this couple (if they are in fact a couple. Another question). In that sense we have been able to share that little slice of life with them.
And it is this that is such an honour, such a privilege for me, and for you the viewer. A connection has been made; a connection that will always be there at some level and to some degree for me and for all of you who view this photograph.
It's a bringing together really, don't you think? A joining of souls, a unification of me, these two people eating lunch, and you, the viewer.
This is the point of what I do as an artist. And I am grateful
Peace!